This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
16 people kept for 20 hours in a small room which was “the size of a van’”
legal analysis
Serbia acted in violation of the prohibition of degrading treatment (Art. 5 UNDHR, Art. 7 ICCPR, Art. 3 ECHR), the protection of property (Art. 17 UNDHR, Art. 1 Protocol 1 ECHR), the right to liberty and security of a person and the freedom from arbitrary arrest or detention (Art. 3, 9 UNDHR, Art. 9 and 10 ICCPR, Art. 5 ECHR) and the right to respect private and family life (Art. 12, UNDHR, Art. 17 ICCPR, Art. 8 ECHR).
The ill-treatment by the 10-12 Serbian police officers -pointing guns at the respondent and screaming “don’t move”- constitutes degrading treatment contrary to Art. 3 ECHR: where an individual is confronted with police officers, “any recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by the person’s conduct diminishes human dignity” (ECtHR, Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], App no. 23380/09, 2015, §§ 81-90 and 101). The collection and burning of the group’s personal belongings (food, tents, bags, pots, jackets etc.), is a clear breach of people’s right to property and integrity of their belongings as set forth in Art. 1 Protocol 1 ECHR.
The arrest and subsequent detention of the respondent infringes her right to liberty and freedom from being detained arbitrarily, Art. 5 ECHR. The prohibition of arbitrary detention is an absolute and non-derogable norm of customary international law (CCPR/C/GC/35, § 66). The respondent was detained without charge, neither during the arrest nor while at the police station did the officers inform the respondent of the reason for her detention. Criminalising “irregular” migration is not a legitimate justification for the use of immigration detention (A/HRC/7/4, § 53) and has in this case led to the respondent’s arbitrary detention and deprivation of liberty.
Conditions of detention, also within the context of migration, must be compatible with respect for human dignity; the health and well-being of the detainees must be adequately secured. The respondent was detained together with 15 people in a room the size of a van without being able to move and the officers refused to give them food and water or access to the toilet. The detention in cramped, unsanitary conditions without access to basic necessities like food, water and toilets infringes the prohibition of degrading treatment, Art. 3 ECHR.
Serbia is not an EU member state where fingerprints of People on the Move are collected for the EURODAC database and where PoM may be under a duty to cooperate. Without any charge or suspicious conduct by the respondent, the forced fingerprinting at the police station is an invasion of privacy contrary to Art. 8 ECHR.
Since three individuals of the group were minors, Serbia also acted in violation of Art. 3, Art. 19, 37 and Art, 39 CRC.