This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
They Forced Her to Undress

legal analysis
The sexual assault of the main respondent also constitutes a clear violation of the prohibition of torture. International human rights law, including the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), clearly distinguishes between lawful body searches and sexual violence: a lawful strip search must be conducted in accordance with established procedures, must be necessary, proportional, and with respect to the dignity of the person searched. The ECtHR has similarly found, in the case of Jalloh v. Germany (2006), that invasive body searches (such as the one described by the respondent in this case) constitute inhuman and degrading treatment as prohibited by Article 3 ECHR. The court established that where searching measures arouse feelings of fear, anguish, and inferiority, and cause both physical pain and mental suffering, then the measures taken by authorities only fail to meet the criteria for a legal strip search but in fact constitute a violation of the prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment. Furthermore, in Aydin v. Turkey (1997), the court ruled that sexual violence could amount to torture in accordance with severe physical and mental suffering inflicted. This act of humiliation was not only a gross violation of her dignity but a clear instance of gendered abuse carried out under the guise of border enforcement.