This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
‘His heart stopped and they took him away – that simple.’

medical analysis
According to IDEAs, people on the move in Serbia who are medically eligible for inpatient psychiatric care are not provided with the opportunity for institutionalisation. This means the respondent would not have been able to access specialised care, even if a psychological evaluation had been conducted, as requested by other camp residents.
legal analysis
Recommendations for the improvement and protection of mental health provision for refugees and asylum seekers from the WHO and PIN were adopted by the Ministry for Health and the Commissariat in 2018. These outline how mental health services should be made available through the public healthcare system and supported by NGOs, where necessary. Despite this, no psychological support is available through the state in AC Sjenica, with the majority of non-governmental services being concentrated in Belgrade. The Commissariat is not fulfilling its obligations to implement the aforementioned guidelines and is allowing the burden of services to fall on civil society groups.Aside from these national policies, Serbia is party to the International Convenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, which, under Article 12, establishes the Right to Health. This applies even if a person is in detention or unlawfully present within a territory, and, therefore, Serbia must provide basic health and safety protections to all persons, including the respondent. These obligations are reaffirmed under Article 54 of Serbia's Asylum Act, which states that asylum seekers shall have the right to access healthcare in an equal manner to citizens.

overview
1 people ,
from Syria,
aged 27.
